This article from Maisonneuve is worth a read. It discusses the changing dynamic of track and field journalism, one that has evolved from a monodirectional and highly controlled presentation to a two-way exchange between stars and fans that is at times both confrontational and disarmingly honest.
I should point out that I post interesting finds like this to Facebook often and rarely take the time to highlight them here. So if you want more of the same, then (be)friend me.
Good article (if a little long). I would have missed that on Facebook — I only check in there a couple of times a week.
I remember reading bits of that Rono thread (BTW, good description of Letsrun — “The site is unprepossessing—a primitive-looking jumble of text with splotches of drab grey and yellow—but it has become an unofficial gathering place for track athletes and fans the world over” — but 80% of threads/comments are rubbish), and being fascinated by his method of preparing for a mile record attempt. I think he was off the mark with the massive mileage base building and little in the way of speedwork.
Saw the Mottram videos too. The interviewer was a wally and needed putting in his place.
Yes, virtually all of the articles in that pub are too long. I skim a lot. I go for months without looking at LetsRun, then return to it and note that most of it’s crap. But there are some good threads sometimes. Since I’m an amateur myself, I can hardly criticize the likes of Flotrack for their sometimes awkward interviews. But at least I try to introduce myself properly and treat the interviewees with some respect and sensitivity.